All posts
Landing pages & CRO

Arcade vs Navattic vs Storylane: Interactive Demo Tools for AI Products

Arcade vs Navattic vs Storylane for AI products: how each interactive demo tool captures non-deterministic output and where it fits on a landing page.

By Mehdi Hassan8 min read

The short answer

In Arcade vs Navattic vs Storylane for an AI product, Arcade is the fastest way to a polished, video-like demo of a single AI workflow. Navattic suits teams that want editable HTML demos of a web app. Storylane suits teams that need both formats plus demo hubs for sales. All three show recorded AI output, so curate it honestly.

Key takeaways

  • Every captured demo freezes AI output, so pick a real, typical result and label it as an example.
  • Arcade fits short, polished demos of one workflow, with video and voiceover built in.
  • Navattic is built around HTML capture, so text in the demo stays editable after capture.
  • Storylane offers screenshot, HTML and video demos, plus hubs that bundle demos for sales.
  • Open the demo from a secondary button or below the hero, and end it on your primary action.

Part of Demo Request Pages: How to Turn 'Book a Demo' Into Booked Meetings

Arcade vs Navattic vs Storylane: which fits an AI product?

Arcade vs Navattic vs Storylane is mainly a choice of capture method and of who will use the demo. Arcade is the quickest to a clean, guided demo that feels like a short video. Navattic captures your product's HTML, which suits complex web apps and edits after capture. Storylane sits between them, with several demo formats and sales-facing hubs.

AI products add a twist none of the comparison pages cover well: the output changes on every run. A demo tool records one run, so your demo shows one answer forever. That's a design decision, not a flaw, and it shapes which tool fits. If you haven't yet decided whether a demo belongs on your site, start with interactive demos and product tours on the homepage. For the page around it, see our guide to book a demo pages.

How do the three interactive demo tools compare?

The three interactive demo software options differ most in how they capture your product, which decides how editable and how realistic the demo is. The table compares what matters for an AI product's landing page.

Factor

Arcade

Navattic

Storylane

Core capture

Screenshots and video, HTML capture on some plans

HTML capture via Chrome extension

Screenshot, HTML and video demos

Editing after capture

Annotations, pan and zoom, HTML editing where included

Edit text and elements in the captured page

Edit screenshots, or HTML on higher tiers

Showing AI output

Strong for streaming and motion via video and AI voiceover

Strong for realistic, editable result screens

Flexible: mix video steps with captured screens

Sales use

Share pages and embeds

Demo personalization and CRM sync

Hubs bundling demos and documents for buyers

Built-in AI

AI drafting and voiceover

AI-assisted demo building; check current docs

AI-assisted demo building; check current docs

Best fit

Marketing-led, one key workflow

Complex web apps, product-led sales

Sales-led teams needing several formats

Treat the table as a starting point. These products ship features quickly, and tier boundaries move, so confirm the capture method you need is on the plan you'd buy.

How do you show non-deterministic AI output in a demo?

Show non-deterministic AI output by choosing one real, typical result, recording it, and saying it's an example. A captured demo can't generate new answers, and that's useful: every visitor sees the same clear result instead of an occasional weak one. The risk is the opposite, a cherry-picked answer your product rarely produces.

  • Pick the typical run, not the best one. Run the same prompt several times and record a result most users would get.
  • Label it. A small "Example output" tag on the result step sets an honest expectation.
  • Show the input. The prompt, file or data the AI worked from makes the result believable.
  • Show the controls. Editing, regenerating, citations or approval steps answer "what if it's wrong?" better than a perfect answer.
  • Keep streaming short. If the output streams in, a short video step shows it better than a static screen.

HTML capture makes editing text after the fact easy, which is handy for removing a customer's name or fixing a typo in your interface. Don't use it to improve the AI's answer. The FTC has warned companies against exaggerating what their AI products can do, and a demo that shows output your product doesn't produce is that kind of claim.

Which tool handles which kind of AI product best?

Match the tool to how your AI product shows its value: as motion, as a result screen, or as a sequence across several surfaces. The capture method that suits that moment matters more than any other feature.

  • Chat or copilot products, where the value is the answer appearing: Arcade or Storylane, because a video step can show text streaming and an agent working, which a static screen can't.
  • Workflow and analytics products, where the value is the finished result: Navattic or Storylane's HTML demos, because the result screen looks like the real app and stays editable as labels change.
  • Agent products that act across tools: a short sequence that shows the plan, the approval step and the outcome. Any of the three can do it; Storylane's mixed formats help when some steps are video and some are screens.
  • Products sold through sales calls: Storylane's hubs or Navattic's personalization help reps send a tailored demo after a call.
Hypothetical example: a five-step demo for an AI contract reviewer

For example, suppose a startup sells an AI tool that reviews vendor contracts. The landing page keeps its headline and a "Book a demo" button, with a secondary "See it review a contract, 90 seconds" link.

The demo has five steps: upload a fictional sample contract, a short video step of the review running, the summary with three flagged clauses labelled "Example output", one flagged clause opened to show the cited text and suggested edit, and an approval screen. The last step offers "Book a demo" and "Try it on your own contract".

The team would use a tool with video steps for the review running and captured screens for the rest, and re-record the result screens whenever the interface changes.

Where should an interactive demo sit on a landing page?

An interactive demo should sit just below the hero or open from a secondary button in it, never replace the headline and primary CTA. The hero's job is the message and the main action; the demo is proof for visitors who want it.

  1. Keep the hero for the message

    Headline, subhead, primary button and a static product image or short loop. Add a secondary "See it in action" link with the demo's length.

  2. Choose inline or popup

    Embed inline below the hero on a dedicated landing page, or open it in a popup or lightbox from the hero link. Arcade's docs, for example, offer an iframe embed and a popout option.

  3. Load it lazily

    Embeds load scripts and images, so load the demo only when it scrolls into view or is opened.

  4. End on the primary action

    The final step repeats your main CTA. A demo that ends on "Thanks for watching" wastes the visitor's best moment.

  5. Track starts and finishes

    Send demo events to your analytics and compare booking rates for finishers and non-finishers.

On phones, a full demo inside a small frame is hard to use. Show a static image with a button that opens the demo full screen, and test it on a real device. The examples in our roundup of book-a-demo page examples show how often demo pages pair a tour with a short form.

Which should you choose?

Choose by who builds the demo and who sends it. If marketing builds one flagship demo for the landing page, speed and polish matter most. If sales sends many tailored demos, editing and hubs matter most. And if a free trial would prove the product faster than any tour, read free trial vs demo vs freemium before buying a demo tool. Our generative AI industry page covers how we approach proof on AI product sites.

Frequently asked questions

Is an interactive demo better than a video for an AI product?
An interactive demo is better when buyers want to explore at their own pace and see the controls, such as editing or approving AI output. A video is better for showing an agent working or text streaming in, and it's faster to watch. Many AI product pages use a short video loop in the hero and an interactive demo for visitors who want to go deeper.
How long should an interactive product demo be?
An interactive product demo for a landing page should cover one workflow in a handful of steps that most visitors can finish in a minute or two. Each step should show one thing and explain it in a sentence. Tell visitors the length before they start, and cut any step that doesn't build toward the result your headline promises.
Should I gate an interactive demo behind a form?
Don't gate the first experience. Let visitors start the demo freely and ask for an email only after they've seen the main result, or offer the full version in exchange for a booking. A form before the demo turns proof into a sales step, and many visitors who would have been convinced by the demo leave before seeing it.
Do interactive demos slow down a landing page?
They can, because embeds load the vendor's scripts and captured images or video. Load the demo only when it scrolls into view or when the visitor clicks to open it, and use a static image as the placeholder. Test page speed on a mid-range phone before and after adding it, and keep the hero free of the embed.
How often should an interactive demo be updated?
Update the demo whenever the interface it shows changes in a way a buyer would notice, such as new navigation, renamed features or a redesigned result screen. For AI products, also re-record when model changes alter typical output. Put a review in your release checklist, because an outdated demo makes the real product feel different from the one you sold.

· CEO & Design Director

Copywriter, designer and developer, and founder of Designify Studio. Over five years, 60+ projects across 14+ industries, for startups that have raised $300M+.

Want this done for you? Landing page, $6,000.

One conversion-focused page, designed by us, developed in Next.js and animated. $6,000, one-time, fixed price. Book a free 30-minute call to see if it fits.

Schedule Call